Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2011 Nov 8;183(16):E1189-202.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101280. Epub 2011 Oct 11.

Efficacy of statins for primary prevention in people at low cardiovascular risk: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Efficacy of statins for primary prevention in people at low cardiovascular risk: a meta-analysis

Marcello Tonelli et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Background: Statins were initially used to improve cardiovascular outcomes in people with established coronary artery disease, but recently their use has become more common in people at low cardiovascular risk. We did a systematic review of randomized trials to assess the efficacy and harms of statins in these individuals.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (to Jan. 28, 2011), registries of health technology assessments and clinical trials, and reference lists of relevant reviews. We included trials that randomly assigned participants at low cardiovascular risk to receive a statin versus a placebo or no statin. We defined low risk as an observed 10-year risk of less than 20% for cardiovascular-related death or nonfatal myocardial infarction, but we explored other definitions in sensitivity analyses.

Results: We identified 29 eligible trials involving a total of 80,711 participants. All-cause mortality was significantly lower among patients receiving a statin than among controls (relative risk [RR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.97) for trials with a 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease < 20% [primary analysis] and 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.94, for trials with 10-year risk < 10% [sensitivity analysis]). Patients in the statin group were also significantly less likely than controls to have nonfatal myocardial infarction (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.49-0.84) and nonfatal stroke (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.96). Neither metaregression nor stratified analyses suggested statistically significant differences in efficacy between high-and low-potency statins, or larger reductions in cholesterol.

Interpretation: Statins were found to be efficacious in preventing death and cardiovascular morbidity in people at low cardiovascular risk. Reductions in relative risk were similar to those seen in patients with a history of coronary artery disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Selection of studies for inclusion in the meta-analysis. RCT = randomized controlled trial.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
Risk of death from any cause associated with the use of statins (versus no statins) in patients at low cardiovascular risk (observed 10-year risk of cardiovascular-related death or nonfatal myocardial infarction < 20%). A relative risk (RR) of less than 1.0 indicates fewer deaths with the use of statins. CI = confidence interval. *Lovastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin. †Rosuvastatin and atorvastatin. For complete study names, see Box 1.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Risk of nonfatal myocardial infarction associated with the use of statins (versus no statins) in patients at low cardiovascular risk (observed 10-year risk of cardiovascular-related death or nonfatal myocardial infarction < 20%). A relative risk (RR) of less than 1.0 indicates fewer events with the use of statins. CI = confidence interval. *Lovastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin. †Rosuvastatin and atorvastatin. For complete study names, see Box 1.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:
Risk of nonfatal stroke associated with the use of statins (versus no statins) in patients at low cardiovascular risk (observed 10-year risk of cardiovascular-related death or nonfatal myocardial infarction < 20%). A relative risk (RR) of less than 1.0 indicates fewer events with the use of statins. CI = confidence interval. *Lovastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin. †Rosuvastatin and atorvastatin. For complete study names, see Box 1.

Comment in

References

    1. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaborators, Kearney PM, Blackwell L, et al. Efficacy of cholesterol-lowering therapy in 18,686 people with diabetes in 14 randomised trials of statins: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2008;371:117–25 - PubMed
    1. National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel Detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health; 2002 - PubMed
    1. Genest J, McPherson R, Frohlich J, et al. 2009 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease in the adult — 2009 recommendations. Can J Cardiol 2009;25: 567–79 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, et al. ; JUPITER Study Group Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med 2008;359:2195–207 - PubMed
    1. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Requirements for health technology assessment template for reports. Ottawa (ON): The Agency; 2008

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances