Generalization of intrinsic ductile-to-brittle criteria by Pugh and Pettifor for materials with a cubic crystal structure
- PMID: 33633140
- PMCID: PMC7907099
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-83953-z
Generalization of intrinsic ductile-to-brittle criteria by Pugh and Pettifor for materials with a cubic crystal structure
Abstract
Two classical criteria, by Pugh and Pettifor, have been widely used by metallurgists to predict whether a material will be brittle or ductile. A phenomenological correlation by Pugh between metal brittleness and its shear modulus to bulk modulus ratio was established more than 60 years ago. Nearly four decades later Pettifor conducted a quantum mechanical analysis of bond hybridization in a series of intermetallics and derived a separate ductility criterion based on the difference between two single-crystal elastic constants, C12-C44. In this paper, we discover the link between these two criteria and show that they are identical for materials with cubic crystal structures.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Thompson RP, Clegg WJ. Predicting whether a material is ductile or brittle. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2018;22:100–108. doi: 10.1016/j.cossms.2018.04.001. - DOI
-
- Pugh SFXCII. Relations between the elastic moduli and the plastic properties of polycrystalline pure metals. Philos. Mag. 1954;7(45):823–843. doi: 10.1080/14786440808520496. - DOI
-
- Tabor D. The Hardness of Metals. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
-
- Gilman JJ. Electronic Basis of the Strength of Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003. pp. 142–173.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
